lundi 31 octobre 2011

Séminaire PPS le 3/11 à 11H, salle 1D23

Chers tous,
cette semaine,le jeudi 3 Nov, nous accueillerons

Pierre-Yves Strub (MSR INRIA)

qui donnera un exposé sur

Toward Machine-Checked Program Verification for Concrete Cryptography


L'exposé débutera à 11H en salle 1D23 et sera précédé par un pot informel pour nous retrouver autour de thé, café et croissant: vous êtes les bienvenus à partir de 10H45.

Plus de détails sur le séminaire à http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/seminaire.

Amicalement,
Claudia

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Pierre-Yves Strub (MSR INRIA)

Toward Machine-Checked Program Verification for Concrete Cryptography
Jeudi 3 Novembre 2011, 11h salle 1D23

Type systems, relational logics, and interactive proof assistants are effective tools for verifying the security of programs and systems that rely on cryptography. They can provide automation, modularity and scalability. As illustrated in recent case studies, they can be usefully applied to large security protocols and applications [Bhargavan et al., 2008, Fournet et al., 2009].

However, their models traditionally rely on abstract assumptions on the underlying cryptographic primitives, expressed in symbolic models. Cryptographers usually reason on security assumptions in lower-level models that precisely account for the complexity and probability of attacks. These models are more complex and realistic, but recent results suggest thay they are also amenable to formal automated verification [Blanchet, 2006, Barthe et al., 2009, Acar et al., 2011].

I will present our on-going work in adapting and extending our programming and verification framework based on refinement types for ML programs [Bengtson et al., 2008, Bhargavan et al., 2010, Fournet, 2011] which currently uses a combination of automated proofs (using Z3, an SMT solver) and interactive proofs (using Coq), in order to produce machine-checked security proofs of cryptographic programs and libraries under concrete computational assumptions.

jeudi 20 octobre 2011

seminaire PPS aujourd'hui, salle 1D23

Chers tous,
aujourd'hui 20 octobre, nous accueillerons

Per Martin-Löf (Université de Stockholm)

qui donnera un exposé intitulé

How did "judgement" come to be a term of logic?

L'exposé débutera à 11H en salle 1D23 et sera précédé par un pot informel pour nous retrouver autour de thé, café et croissant:vous êtes les bienvenus à partir de 10H45.

Plus de détails sur le séminaire à http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/seminaire.

Amicalement,
Claudia

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Per Martin-Löf (Université de Stockholm)
How did "judgement" come to be a term of logic?

Jeudi 20 octobre 2011, 11H en salle 1D23

Résumé: Beginning with Descartes and continuing via Kant to Frege and Husserl, "judgement" has been a central term of logic and philosophy in general. It was not a complete novelty, however, because the Latin "judicium" was used already in the Middle Ages. On the other hand, the Greek "krisis", of which "judicium" is the Latin translation, does not occur in Aristotle's Organon, from which most of our logical terminology derives. So two questions arise, one historical: where did we get it from? and the other thematic: does it deserve to be retained as a central term of
logic.

lundi 17 octobre 2011

Séminaire PPS: Per Martin-Löf le 20/10 à 11H, salle 1D23

Chers tous,

cette semaine,le jeudi 20 octobre, nous accueillerons

Per Martin-Löf (Université de Stockholm)

 qui  donnera un exposé intitulé 

How did "judgement" come to be a term of logic?

 L'exposé débutera à 11H en salle 1D23 et sera précédé par un pot informel pour nous retrouver autour de thé, café et croissant:vous êtes les bienvenus à partir de 10H45. 

Plus de détails sur le séminaire à http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/seminaire.

Amicalement,
Claudia

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Per Martin-Löf (Université de Stockholm)
How did "judgement" come to be a term of logic?

Jeudi 20 octobre 2011, 11H en salle 1D23

Résumé: Beginning with Descartes and continuing via Kant to Frege and Husserl, "judgement" has been a central term of logic and philosophy in general. It was not a complete novelty, however, because the Latin "judicium" was used already in the Middle Ages. On the other hand, the Greek "krisis", of which "judicium" is the Latin translation, does not occur in Aristotle's Organon, from which most of our logical terminology derives. So two questions arise, one historical: where did we get it from? and the other thematic: does it deserve to be retained as a central term of
logic.